Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2025, 61(4): 345-374 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2024.022

A Classic Sociologist for Our Time: Pierre Bourdieu’s General Theory

Marek Skovajsa ORCID...
Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, Praha

This paper draws attention to one possible intellectual factor that has contributed to Pierre Bourdieu’s undeniable status as a contemporary classic. Despite his frequent sorties against general theorising, Bourdieu has produced his own kind of general sociological theory that, in a crowd of competitors, is better suited than most to meeting the demand that is present across the field of sociology and other social sciences for a general but non-universalist theory. It is possible to distinguish four relevant properties of theories, which are correlated but mutually irreducible one to the other: conceptual generality, generality of application (universality), substantive scope (domain), and abstractness. I argue that, with respect to the four, Bourdieu’s theory is best characterised as exceptionally strong on conceptual generality and substantive scope, but limited in terms of its universality. Bourdieu’s central methodological device, theoretical induction, produces knowledge that is both domain-specific and indefinitely extendable to new empirical domains, thereby providing the basis for an ever-expanding scope. An analytical review of Bourdieu’s published work (books) shows its vast substantive scope, by virtue of which it is a theory of the social world in its totality. Bourdieu’s theory occupies a place in the ill-defined middle ground between grand theory and empiricism and in some respects resembles a middle-range theory. But Bourdieu’s anti-positivist constructivism is resistant to the empiricist fragmentation and loss of theoretical momentum that afflicts middle-range theories. I conclude here that the extraordinary success of Bourdieu’s sociology can be partly explained by its ability to satisfy the demand for a general theory in the post-1960s intellectual climate that is inimical to universalist claims by offering its own brand of theory that avoids the typical shortcomings of both abstract grand theorising and limited-use middle-range theories.

Keywords: Pierre Bourdieu, sociological classics, sociological theory, general theory, middle-range theory, history of sociology

Received: August 13, 2022; Revised: June 26, 2024; Accepted: July 2, 2024; Prepublished online: July 2, 2024; Published: November 3, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Skovajsa, M. (2025). A Classic Sociologist for Our Time: Pierre Bourdieu’s General Theory. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review61(4), 345-374. doi: 10.13060/csr.2024.022
Download citation

References

  1. Atkinson, W. (2020). Luc Boltanski's pragmatic sociology: A Bourdieusian critique. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(3), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431019855004 Go to original source...
  2. Bachelard, G. (2018). "Nový vědecký duch." In G. Bachelard, Nový vědecký duch a další eseje (přel. J. Joseph) (s. 47-171). Malvern. (Pův. vyd. 1934)
  3. Baehr, P. et al. (2016). Founders, Classics, Canons: Modern Disputes over the Origins and Appraisal of Sociology's Heritage (2. vyd.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203791615 (Pův. vyd. 2002) Go to original source...
  4. Balon, J. (2008). Nenaplněný příslib sociologické teorie: vzestup a pád americké sociologie ve druhé polovině dvacátého století. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 44(5), 943-967. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.5.05 Go to original source...
  5. Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2009)
  6. Boltanski, L. (2012). Love and Justice as Competences: Three Essays on the Sociology of Action. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 1990)
  7. Boudon, R. (1991). What middle-range theories are. Contemporary Sociology, 20(4), 519-522. https://doi.org/10.2307/2071781 Go to original source...
  8. Boudon, R. a Lazarsfeld, P. F. (eds.). (1965). Le vocabulaire des sciences sociales. Concepts et indices. Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111586809 Go to original source...
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1962a). Célibat et condition paysanne. Études rurales, 2(5-6), 32-135. https://doi.org/10.3406/rural.1962.1011 Go to original source...
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1962b). The Algerians. Beacon Press. (Pův. vyd. 1958)
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1969). Intellectual field and creative project. Social Science Information, 8(2), 89-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901846900800205 (Pův. vyd. 1966) Go to original source...
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1975). The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602 Go to original source...
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812507 (Pův. vyd. 1972) Go to original source...
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1979). Algeria 1960. Cambridge University Press - Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. (Pův. vyd. 1963)
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Harvard University Press. (Pův. vyd. 1979)
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (s. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
  17. Bourdieu, P. (1987). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 814-853. (Pův. vyd. 1986)
  18. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 1984)
  19. Bourdieu, P. (1990a). The Logic of Practice. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749 (Pův. vyd. 1980) Go to original source...
  20. Bourdieu, P. (1990b). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558 (Pův. vyd. 1987) Go to original source...
  21. Bourdieu, P. (1991a). Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research, 13(1), 1-44. (Pův. vyd. 1971)
  22. Bourdieu, P. (1991b). The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 1988)
  23. Bourdieu, P. (1991c). Language and Symbolic Power. Polity Press.
  24. Bourdieu, P. (1993a). Sociology in Question. Sage. (Pův. vyd. 1980)
  25. Bourdieu, P. (1993b). The Field of Cultural Production. Columbia University Press.
  26. Bourdieu, P. (1995). Sociální prostor a symbolická moc (přel. A. Lhotová a H. Prousková). In F. Mayer, V. Hubinger a L. Bazac-Billaud (eds.), Antologie francouzských společenských věd: antropologie, sociologie, historie. Cahiers du CEFRES No. 8 (s. 213-233). CEFRES. (Pův. vyd. 1987)
  27. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503615427 (Pův. vyd. 1989) Go to original source...
  28. Bourdieu, P. (1997). Passport to Duke. Metaphilosophy, 28(4), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00072 Go to original source...
  29. Bourdieu, P. (1998a). Teorie jednání (přel. V. Dvořáková). Karolinum. (Pův. vyd. 1994)
  30. Bourdieu, P. (1998b). Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. Polity Press.
  31. Bourdieu, P. (1999a). The Social Conditions of the International Circulation of Ideas. In R. Shusterman (ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader (s. 220-228). Blackwell. (Pův. vyd. 1990)
  32. Bourdieu, P. et al. (1999b). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 1993)
  33. Bourdieu, P. (2000a) Prednáška o prednáške (přel. M. Kanovský). Filozofia, 55(5), 424-438. (Pův. vyd. 1982)
  34. Bourdieu, P. (2000b). Nadvláda mužů (přel. V. Dvořáková). Karolinum. (Pův. vyd. 1998)
  35. Bourdieu, P. (2002a). Reprodukční strategie a formy nadvlády (přel. K. Dohnalová). SPFSSBU - Sociální studia (8), 77-91. (Pův. vyd. 1994)
  36. Bourdieu, P. (2002b). O televizi (přel. N. Obrtelová). Doplněk. (Pův. vyd. 1996)
  37. Bourdieu, P. (2003a). Firing Back: Against the Tyranny of the Market 2. Verso. (Pův. vyd. 2001)
  38. Bourdieu, P. (2003b). Zúčastněná objektivace: Huxleyho přednáška (přel. K. Weissová). Biograf, 10(30), 3-17. (Pův. vyd. 2003) Go to original source...
  39. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2001)
  40. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The Social Structures of the Economy. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2000)
  41. Bourdieu, P. (2008). The Bachelors' Ball: The Crisis of Peasant Society in Béarn. Univer¬sity of Chicago Press. (Pův. vyd. 2002)
  42. Bourdieu, P. (2010). Pravidla umění: Vznik a struktura literárního pole (přel. P. Kyloušek a P. Dytrt). Host. (Pův. vyd. 1992)
  43. Bourdieu, P. (2011). Champ du pouvoir et division du travail de domination. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 2011(5)/(190), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.190.0126 Go to original source...
  44. Bourdieu, P. (2012). Sociologické hledání sebe sama (přel. J. Klokočková). Doplněk. (Pův. vyd. 2004)
  45. Bourdieu, P. (2013). Chvála sociologie (přel. J. Fulka). Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 49(1), 141-148.
  46. Bourdieu, P. (2014a). Co se chce říct mluvením: Ekonomie jazykové směny (přel. M. Pokorný). Karolinum. (Pův. vyd. 1982)
  47. Bourdieu, P. (2014b). On the State: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989-1992. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2012)
  48. Bourdieu, P. (2017a). Manet: A Symbolic Revolution. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2013)
  49. Bourdieu, P. (2017b). Anthropologie économique. Cours au Collège de France (1992-1993). Raisons d'Agir/Seuil.
  50. Bourdieu, P. (2019a). Classification Struggles: General Sociology, Volume 1 (1981-1982). Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2015)
  51. Bourdieu, P. (2019b). Habitus and Field: General Sociology, Volume 2 (1982-1983). Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2015)
  52. Bourdieu, P. (2021). Forms of Capital: General Sociology, Volume 3: Lectures at the Collège de France 1983-84. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2016)
  53. Bourdieu, P. (2022a). Principles of Vision, Volume 4: General Sociology. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 2016)
  54. Bourdieu, P. (2022b). Microcosmes: Théorie des champs. Liber/Raisons d'Agir.
  55. Bourdieu, P. (2022c). L'Intérêt au désintéressement. Cours au Collège de France (1987-1989). Raisons d'Agir/Seuil.
  56. Bourdieu, P. (2022d). Retour sur la réflexivité. Éditions EHESS.
  57. Bourdieu, P. (2023a). Pascalovské meditace (přel. J. Petříček). Karolinum. (Pův. vyd. 1997)
  58. Bourdieu, P. (2023b). Impérialismes: Circulation internationale des idées et luttes pour l'universel. Raisons d'Agir.
  59. Bourdieu, P., Boltanski, L., Castel, R., Chamboredon, J.-C. a Schnapper, D. (1990). Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 1965)
  60. Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C. a Passeron, J.-C. (1991). The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856460 (Pův. vyd. 1968) Go to original source...
  61. Bourdieu, P., Darbel, A., Rivet, J.-P. a Seibel, C. (1963). Travail et travailleurs en Algérie. Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112466544 Go to original source...
  62. Bourdieu, P., Darbel A. et al. (pseud. Darras). (1966). Le Partage des bénéfices. Expansion et inégalité en France. Minuit.
  63. Bourdieu, P., Darbel, A. a Schnapper, D. (1991). The Love of Art: European Art Museums and their Public. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 1969)
  64. Bourdieu, P. a Delsaut, Y. (1975). Le couturier et sa griffe: contribution à une théorie de la magie. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1(1), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1975.2447 Go to original source...
  65. Bourdieu, P. a Krais, B. (1991). Meanwhile I have come to know all the diseases of sociological understanding. In P. Bourdieu, J.-C. Chamboredon a J.-C. Passeron, The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries (s. 247-259). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856460.247 Go to original source...
  66. Bourdieu, P. a Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Sage. (Pův. vyd. 1970)
  67. Bourdieu, P. a Passeron, J.-C. (1979). The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relation to Culture. University of Chicago Press. (Pův. vyd. 1964)
  68. Bourdieu, P. a Sayad, A. (2020). Uprooting: The Crisis of Traditional Agriculture in Algeria. Polity Press. (Pův. vyd. 1964)
  69. Bourdieu, P. a Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press.
  70. Brubaker, R. (1993). Social theory as habitus. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma a M. Postone (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (s. 212-234). University of Chicago Press.
  71. Camic, C. (2014). Periphery toward Center and Back: Scholarship on the History of Sociology, 1945-2012. In R. E. Backhouse a P. Fontaine (eds.), A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences, (s. 99-143). Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139794817.004 Go to original source...
  72. Cartwright, N. (2020). Middle-range theory. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 35(3), 269-323. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.21479 Go to original source...
  73. Connell, R. W. (2007). Southern Theory. The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117346 Go to original source...
  74. Dopita, M. (2013). Recepce díla Pierra Bourdieua v české/slovenské sociologii. In M. Tížik (ed.), Pierre Bourdieu ako inšpirácia pre sociologický výskum (s. 277-295). Sociologický ústav SAV.
  75. Dubet, F. (2007). Why Remain 'Classical'? European Journal of Social Theory, 10(2), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007078891 Go to original source...
  76. Fabiani, J.-L. (2021). Pierre Bourdieu. A Heroic Structuralism. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004442610 (Pův. vyd. 2016) Go to original source...
  77. Fournier, M. (2002). Reflections on the legacy of Pierre Bourdieu. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 27(4), 577-581. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341592 Go to original source...
  78. Fournier, M. (2022). Pierre Bourdieu and his legacy. In G. Delanty a S. P. Turner (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory (2. vyd.) (s. 49-59). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111399-3 Go to original source...
  79. Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488801 Go to original source...
  80. Hedström, P. a Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. In P. Hedström a R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (s. 1-31). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663901.001 Go to original source...
  81. Heilbron, J. (2011). Practical Foundations of Theorizing in Sociology: The Case of Pierre Bourdieu. In Ch. Camic, N. Gross a M. Lamont (eds.), Social Knowledge in the Making (s. 181-205). University of Chicago Press.
  82. Heinich, N. (2007). Pourquoi Bourdieu. Gallimard.
  83. Horák, P. (1986). Pierre Bourdieu: sociologie praxe a její některé teoretické předpoklady. Sociológia, 18(5), 589-599.
  84. Hyánková, T. (2013). Pierre Bourdieu a Kabylové: Idealizace, identifikace, instrumentalizace? Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 49(1), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2013.49.1.05 Go to original source...
  85. Jeřábek, H. (2022). How empirical social research gained ascendancy in post-war France. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 58(3), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2021.044 Go to original source...
  86. Joly, M. (2012). Devenir Norbert Elias. Histoire croisée d'un processus de reconnaissance scientifique: la réception française. Fayard.
  87. Joly, M. (2022). La sociologie réflexive de Pierre Bourdieu. CNRS Éditions. (Pův. vyd. 2018 pod názvem Pour Bourdieu)
  88. Katrňák, T. (2005). Třídní analýza a sociální mobilita. Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
  89. Kauppi, N. a Swartz, D. (2015). Global Bourdieu. Comparative Sociology, 14(4), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341358 Go to original source...
  90. Kilminster, R. (1998). The Sociological Revolution: From the Enlightenment to the Global Age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029695 Go to original source...
  91. Korom, P. (2020). The prestige elite in sociology: toward a collective biography of the most cited scholars (1970-2010). The Sociological Quarterly, 61(1), 128-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1581037 Go to original source...
  92. Lamont, M. (2012). How has Bourdieu been good to think with? The case of the United States. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01309.x Go to original source...
  93. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press. (Pův. vyd. 1993)
  94. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 Go to original source...
  95. Lindemann, G. (2011). On Latour's social theory and theory of society, and his contribution to saving the world. Human Studies, 34, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9178-9 Go to original source...
  96. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. Enlarged Edition. Free Press.
  97. Mills, Ch. W. (1968). Sociologická imaginace. Mladá fronta. (Pův. vyd. 1959)
  98. Mišovič, J. (2023). Teorie sociálních polí P. Bourdieuho - inspirace pro identifikaci podobných fenoménů. Sociológia, 55(3), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2023.55.3.12 Go to original source...
  99. Mouzelis, N. (2008). Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811418 Go to original source...
  100. Outhwaite, W. (2009). Canon Formation in Late 20th-Century British Sociology. Sociology, 43(6), 1029-1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509345696 Go to original source...
  101. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. The Free Press.
  102. Petrusek, M. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu - od Kabylů k "velké sociologické teorii". In P. Bourdieu, Nadvláda mužů (s. 113-137). Karolinum.
  103. Pinto, L. (1998). Pierre Bourdieu et la théorie du monde social. Albin Michel.
  104. Růžička, M. a Vašát, P. (2011). Základní koncepty Pierra Bourdieu: pole - kapitál - habitus. AntropoWebzin, 7(2), 129-133.
  105. Salle, G. (2016). Théorie des champs, prison et pénalité: Vers la construction du "champ pénitentiaire". Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 2016(3) (N° 213), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.213.0004 Go to original source...
  106. Sapiro, G. (ed.). (2020). Dictionnaire international Bourdieu. CNRS Éditions. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psorbonne.87105 Go to original source...
  107. Swedberg, R. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery. Theory and Society, 41(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9161-5 Go to original source...
  108. Swedberg, R. (2020). On the use of abstractions in sociology: The classics and beyond. Journal of Classical Sociology, 20(4), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X1986 Go to original source...
  109. Sztompka, P. (1986). Robert K. Merton: An Intellectual Profile. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18160-5 Go to original source...
  110. Tížik, M. (ed.). (2013). Pierre Bourdieu ako inšpirácia pre sociologický výskum. Sociologický ústav SAV.
  111. Turner, J. H. (2012). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Sage.
  112. van den Berg, A. (1998). Is sociological theory too grand for social mechanisms? In P. Hedström a R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (s. 204-237). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663901.009 Go to original source...
  113. Verter, B. (2003). Spiritual capital: Theorizing religion with Bourdieu against Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 21(2), 150-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.00182 Go to original source...
  114. Wacquant, L. (2013). Symbolic power and group-making: On Pierre Bourdieu's reframing of class. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), 274-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X12468737 Go to original source...
  115. Znaniecki, F. (1934). The Method of Sociology. Farrar & Rinehart.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.