Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2002, 38(6): 771-788 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2002.38.6.05

Marriage and Cohabitation: Qualitative Differences in Partnership Arrangements

Dana Hamplová
Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

Published: December 1, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hamplová, D. (2002). Marriage and Cohabitation: Qualitative Differences in Partnership Arrangements. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 38(6), 771-788. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2002.38.6.05
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Axinn, W., A. Thornton 1992. "The Relationship Between Cohabitation and Divorce: Selectivity or Casual Influence?" Demography 29: 357-374. Go to original source...
    2. Becker, G.S. 1993. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press.
    3. Berger, P. L., H. Kellner 1979. Facing up to Modernity. Harmondworth: Penguin Books.
    4. Blackwell, D. L., D.T. Lichter 2000. "Mate Selection among Married and Cohabiting Couples". Journal of Family Issues Vol. 21 (3): 275-303. Go to original source...
    5. Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Jon Wiley and Sons.
    6. Blumstein, P., P. Schwartz 1983. American Couples: Money, Work, and Sex. New York: Morrow.
    7. Brines, J., K. Joyner 1999. "The Ties That Bind: Principles of Cohesion in Cohabitation and Marriage". American Sociological Review 64: 333-355. Go to original source...
    8. Brown, S., A. Booth 1996. "Cohabitation versus Marriage: A Comparison of Relationship Quality". Journal of Marriage and the Family 5, 3: 668-679. Go to original source...
    9. Bumpass, L. L., J. A. Sweet 1989. "National Estimates of Cohabitation". Demography 26: 615-625. Go to original source...
    10. Carmichael, G. 1995. "Consensual Partnering in the More Developed Countries". Journal of the Australian Population Association 121: 51-86. Go to original source...
    11. Clarberg, M. 1999. "The Price of Partnering: The Role of Economic Well-being in Young Adults' First Union Experiences". Social Forces 77, 3: 945-969. Go to original source...
    12. DeMaris, A., W. MacDonald 1993. "Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Instability : A Test of the Unconventionality Hypothesis". Journal of Marriage and the Family 55, 2: 399-408. Go to original source...
    13. DeMaris, A., K.V. Rao 1992. "Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Stability in the United States: A Reassessment". Journal of Marriage and the Family 54, 1: 178-201. Go to original source...
    14. De Santis, Livi Bacci. 2001. "Reflections on the Economics of the Fertility Decline in Europe". Euresco Conference, The Second Demographic Transition in Europe, Bad Herrenalb, Germany, 23-28 June 2001.
    15. Hamplová, D., S. Pikálková, J. Rychtaříková 2001. "Diferenciace reprodukčního a rodinného chování v evropských populacích" [Differentiation of Reproductive and Family Behaviour in the Populations of Europe]. Sociological Papers 01:10, Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    16. Horwitz, A.V., White, H.R. 1998. "The Relationship of Cohabitation and Mental Health: A Study of a Young Adult Cohort". Journal of Marriage and the Family 60, 2: 505-515 Go to original source...
    17. Kiernan, K. 2000. "European Perspectives on Union Formation". Pp. 54-78 in The Ties that Bind. Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, edited by L.J. Waite. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
    18. Kučera, M. 1994. Populace České republiky 1918-1991. (The Population of the Czech Republic 1918-1991). Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    19. Manning W.D., D.T. Lichter 1996. "Parental Cohabitation and Children's Economic Well-being". Journal of Marriage and the Family 58: 998-1010. Go to original source...
    20. Oppenheimer, V. K., L. Nelson 1997. "Men's Career Development and Marriage Timing During a Period of Rising Inequality". Demography 34: 311-330. Go to original source...
    21. Rabušic, L. 2001. Kde ty všechny děti jsou? (Where Have All the Kids Gone) Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
    22. Rabušic, L. 1996. "O současném vývoji manželského a rodinného chování v České republice" (On Current Developments in Marriage and Family Behaviour in the Czech Republic). Demografie 38, 3: 173-180.
    23. Rindfuss, R.R., A. VandenHeuvel 1990. "Cohabitation: Precursor to Marriage or an Alternative to Being Single?" Population and Development Review 16: 703-726. Go to original source...
    24. Schoen R., Weinick, R. 1993. "Partner Choices in Marriage and Cohabitations". Journal of Marriage and the Family 55: 408-414. Go to original source...
    25. South, S.J., G. Spitze 1994. "Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households". American Sociological Review 59, 327-347. Go to original source...
    26. Stack, S., J.R. Eshleman 1998. "Marital Status and Happiness: A 17-Nations Study". Journal of Marriage and the Family 60, 2: 527-537. Go to original source...
    27. Thomson, E., U. Collela 1992. "Cohabitation and Marital Stability: Quality or Commitment?" Journal of Marriage and the Family 54, 2: 259-268 Go to original source...
    28. Vereš, P. 1991. "Několik úvah o současném a budoucím populačním vývoji" [Some Thoughts on the Present and Future Population Development]. Demografie 33, 2: 97-104.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content