Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2009, 45(4): 649-670 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.4.02

Gender in Science: Theoretical Perspectives and Their Application in Research

Mariana Szapuová
Centrum rodových štúdií, Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave

The objective of this article is to show how issues concerning women in science and the problem of gendered science, often treated separately, are interconnected. To examine how research on women in science and research on gender and science relate to each other, some feminist epistemological perspectives, mainly feminist contextual empiricism, are used in order to show how the feminist philosophical conceptual framework may be useful for understanding the problems currently faced by women in science. After reflecting and elaborating on the very thesis of gendered science, the author analyses in more detail the concept of epistemic communities and the concept of trust as an epistemic factor. Through these concepts the author argues that philosophical/ epistemological considerations are fruitful for studying the experience of individual women in science. Both of these interrelated concepts are considered highly relevant in the search for an epistemological framework facilitating the thematic study of women in science on a theoretical level and research on the current situation of women in the academic world in Slovakia.

Keywords: feminist epistemologies, gendered science, epistemic communities, trust, equal opportunities, Slovakia.

Published: August 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Szapuová, M. (2009). Gender in Science: Theoretical Perspectives and Their Application in Research. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review45(4), 649-670. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.4.02
Download citation

References

  1. Blagojević, Marina, Hana Havelková, Nikolina Sretenova, Mioara Florica Tripsa, Daniela Velichová (eds.). 2004. Premárnené talenty: od osobných zápasov k věci verejnej. Ženy a veda v krajinách Enwise. Brusel: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
  2. Bútorová, Zora, Jarmila Filadelfiová, Jana Cviková, Oľga Gyárfášová, Katarína Farkašová. 2002. "Ženy, muži a rovnosť príležitostí." Pp. 405-443 in Miroslav Kollár, Grigorij Mesežnikov (eds.). Slovensko 2002. Súhrnná správa o stave spoločnosti. Bratislava: Inštitút pre verejné otázky.
  3. Dillon, Robin. 1997. "K feministickej koncepcii sebaúcty." Aspekt 5 (1): 44-50.
  4. Farkašová, Etela. 1998. "Poznávajú ženy inak? O genéze, povahe a cieľoch feministických epistemológií." Aspekt 6 (1): 111-124.
  5. Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
  6. Hardwig, John. 1991. "The Role of Trust in Knowledge." The Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693-708. Go to original source...
  7. Havelková, Hana. 2007. "Problém takzvané harmonizace: náprava 'nezamýšlených důsledků' moderní společnosti." Pp. 10-18 in Kateřina Šaldová (ed.). Cesty labyrintem. O vědecké profesi, soukromém životě a jejich propojování. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
  8. Kiczková, Zuzana. 1998. Príroda - vzor žena? Hľadanie alternatív v ekofeminizme. Bratislava: Aspekt.
  9. Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures. How The Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
  10. Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory, Helen E. Longino. 1997. "The Women, Gender and Science Question: What Do Research on Women in Science and Research on Gender and Science Have to Do with Each Other?" Pp. 3-16 in Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, Helen E. Longino (eds.). Women, Gender, and Science: New Directions. Osiris, Vol. 12. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  11. Lagerspetz, Olli. 1998. Trust. The Tacit Demand. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Go to original source...
  12. Linková, Marcela. 2007. "Ženy ve vědě po roce 1989: český aktivizmus a evropské debaty." Pp. 34-38 in Marcela Linková (ed.). Trans/formace: Gender, věda a společnost. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
  13. Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  14. Longino, Helen E. 1993. "Essential Tensions - Phase Two: Feminist, Philosophical, and Social Studies of Science." Pp. 257-273 in Louise M. Antony, Charlotte Witt (eds.). A Mind of One´s Own. Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  15. Longino, Helen E. 1998. "Hodnoty a objektivita." Aspekt (1): 86-96.
  16. Longino, Helen E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, N.J., Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  17. Nagl-Docekal, Herta. 2007. Feministická filozofie. Výsledky, problémy, perspektívy. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  18. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who Knows. From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  19. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1998. "Epistemologické komunity." Aspekt 8 (1): 96-111.
  20. Rolin, Kristina. 2002. "Gender and trust in science." Hypatia 17 (4): 95-118. Go to original source...
  21. Szapuová, Mariana. 2006. "Dôvera a jej epistemická funkcia vo vede." Pp. 433-440 in Eugen Andreanský (ed.). Filozofia v kontexte globalizujúceho sa sveta. Bratislava: Iris.
  22. Szapuová, Mariana. 2009. "Pohľady na/cez sklenený strop." Pp. 361-391 in Mariana Szapuová, Zuzana Kiczková, Jana Zezulová (eds.). Na ceste k rodovej rovnosti: ženy a muži v akademickom prostredí. Bratislava: Iris.
  23. Szapuová, Mariana, Zuzana Kiczková, Jana Zezulová (eds.). 2009. Na ceste k rodovej rovnosti: ženy a muži v akademickom prostredí. Bratislava: Iris.
  24. Šmausová, Gerlinda. 2005. "Současnost nesoučasností: nepřehledné vlnobití feminismů." Pp. 16-37 in Libuše Heczková et al. (ed.). Vztahy, jazyky, těla. Praha: Fakulta humanitních studií Univerzity Karlovy.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.